Against ethics and reason, some people are more interested in injecting vaccines straight into the blood stream of monkeys to see exaggerated side effects (“because it’s so cool”). WE ALREADY KNOW THIS STUFF IS BAD!
Gain-of-function was an intentional distraction imho. If anything, they used what they learned from that research to make synthetic virus injectable bioweapons, no?
No one is looking into blood samples of actively infected people who are unvaccinated. Why is the effect on blood different in people with symptoms from “covid” when it is apparently the same spike protein (and even more proteins!) as in the vaccines? No one cares. Why?
The spikes in c19 are different from the mRNA ones. Proof? The body reacts differently and produces a broad and long-lasting immunity from infection, and squat from the faccines.
The body reacting to a foreign infidel is different to the body producing it, That is why they are not publicising that fact.
I am more concerned about the focus of the people on our side. They keep ignoring certain nuances and inconsistencies. I am trying to find out if that’s done deliberately or if it’s just ignorance.
Why is everyone ignoring the thought of what it would mean if their was no threat and therefore zero reason to declare a pandemic?
It's certainly a possible scenario that unfortunately looks more likely everyday
EVERYONE WAKE UP !
We can attack the whole narrative and destroy it in court after we proved that there never was a reason for a pandemic!
Against ethics and reason, some people are more interested in injecting vaccines straight into the blood stream of monkeys to see exaggerated side effects (“because it’s so cool”). WE ALREADY KNOW THIS STUFF IS BAD!
How many bio weapons do we know of? How many bio weapons attacks (and which types!) do we know of? How many bio weapons were found in Iraq?
EVERYONE:
Why would Obama give the impression that gain-of-function is dangerous if he is taking part in this big lie?
—>> THINK! <<—
.
Gain-of-function was an intentional distraction imho. If anything, they used what they learned from that research to make synthetic virus injectable bioweapons, no?
That's some transfected blood all right. That person is probably dead already
That is a YUGE problem that I have raised since 2021. Since most donors had been faccinated, ......
No one is looking into blood samples of actively infected people who are unvaccinated. Why is the effect on blood different in people with symptoms from “covid” when it is apparently the same spike protein (and even more proteins!) as in the vaccines? No one cares. Why?
The spikes in c19 are different from the mRNA ones. Proof? The body reacts differently and produces a broad and long-lasting immunity from infection, and squat from the faccines.
The body reacting to a foreign infidel is different to the body producing it, That is why they are not publicising that fact.
They don’t want to entertain the thought of what it would mean if their was no threat and therefore zero reason to declare a pandemic!
I had in mind the average punter, not "them".
I am more concerned about the focus of the people on our side. They keep ignoring certain nuances and inconsistencies. I am trying to find out if that’s done deliberately or if it’s just ignorance.
That is also my pet mental research project. I am puzzled; astounded and curious all at once.
However, people are being not forthright why they took the faccines.
MOST KNEW OF THE RISKS BEFOREHAND!
Here the analysis of the different spike.
The vid of the vaxxed blood has been done previously, while in unvaxxed, there is just nothing to see, mostly.
https://anandamide.substack.com/p/differences-in-vaccine-and-sars-cov?s=r